Legal Opinion
Combs v. Lairmore
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 26, 1924No. 12660PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
SHACKELFORD, C.
The parties will b^ referred to as plaintiffs and defendants as they appeared in the count , below.
The plaintiffs, W. A. Combs et al., commenced this action in the district court of McIntosh county for the purpose of canceling a certain d^ed, dated September 21, 1918, by which J. W. Combs conveyed the southwest quarter of sec. 18, twp. 12 N., rge. 18 E., in McIntosh., county, to the defendant B. ■C. Lairmore. The plaintiffs are the sons and daughter of J- W. Combs, who died intestate on the 5th day of March, 1919, and left the plaintiffs as his heirs. They seek to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Campbell v. HarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Probert v. CaswellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Hill v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- McClintick, Adm'r v. EllisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Foley v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Likowski v. CatlettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Wagner v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- First Nat. Bank of Anadarko v. OrmeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Elem v. MahannahSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Coffey v. ConneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.