Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Anadarko v. Orme

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 7, 1926No. 17169PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUTH, C.

While Pearl Orme, hereinafter designated as plaintiff, brought her action against the First National Bank of Anadarko, hereinafter called defendant, wherein the plaintiff seeks to have canceled a certain note and mortgage, said.mortgage covering her homestead allotment, and to have her title to the lands quieted, and plaintiff alleges that, if she ever executed the note and mortgage, she has no knowledge of her act, as at -the time the same purports to have been signed she was of unsound mind and wholly incapable of using discretion in the transaction of her business…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Harding v. WheatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  2. Allore v. JewellSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Ikerd v. BeaversIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Fishburne & Wife v. Ferguson's HeirsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887
  5. Miller v. FolsomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McClain v. Ricks Exploration Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
  2. Dawson v. DouglasCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
  3. Griffin v. MaysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Transcontinental Ins. Co. v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API