Legal Opinion

Miller v. Miller

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 19, 1967No. 542PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant’s first two assignments of error relate to the refusal of the judge to allow him to cross-examine plaintiff and to elicit oral testimony from his mother. In recognition of the limitations of time and the duration of sessions of court, the General Assembly provided in G.S. 50-16 that applications for alimony pendente lite “may be heard in or out of term, orally or upon affidavit, or either or. both.” With these words, the legislature gave the judge hearing the motion the discretion to decide in what form he should receive the evidence in his efforts to ascertain the truth. In hearing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Mercer v. MercerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Rowland v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Schloss v. SchlossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Dixon v. DixonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Peeler v. PeelerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  4. McAlister v. McAlisterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Horton v. HortonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API