Legal Opinion

Mercer v. Mercer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 12, 1960No. 171PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParkeR, J.

G.S. 50-16 under which plaintiff seeks relief provides two remedies — one, for alimony without divorce, and the other, for a reasonable subsistence and counsel fees pending the trial and final disposition of the issues involved in such action. Fogartie v. Fogartie, 236 N.C. 188, 72 S.E. 2d 226, and cases there cited.

G.S. 50-16 provides, that “if any husband shall separate himself from his wife and fail to provide her . . . with the necessary subsistence according to his means and condition in life, ... , or be guilty of any misconduct or acts that would be or constitute cause for divorce,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bizzell v. BizzellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  2. Heflin v. HeflinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
  3. McLean v. McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Bowling v. BowlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Fogartie v. FogartieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Rickert v. RickertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Sayland Ex Rel. McLendon v. SaylandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Schloss v. SchlossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Harrell v. HarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API