Legal Opinion
McAlister v. McAlister
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided March 29, 1972No. 7219DC103PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, Judge.
The only issue raised in this Court is whether it was error for the trial judge to deny defendant’s motion to have the record taken by an official court reporter.
The defendant argues that it was error to deny his motion for a reporter and that the absence of a reporter impaired his right of appeal.
The North Carolina General Statutes require only that “ [c] ourt-reporting personnel shall be utilized, if available, for the reporting of civil trials in the district court.” G.S. 7A-198 (emphasis added). If a reporter is not available in any county, other means may be employed to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Frost v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- State v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Lindsey v. CastonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Universal Life Ins. Co. v. LarremoreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Dixon v. DixonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Horton v. HortonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- In Re the Custody of CoxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.