Legal Opinion

Horton v. Horton

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1993No. 17807, 17819PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOVRIEN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal and cross-appeal from an order reducing but not eliminating the payment of alimony. We affirm.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

David Horton, (David), and Barbara Horton, (Barbara), were divorced in 1987. The original judgment and decree of divorce, and the two amended decrees of divorce later entered by stipulation of the parties, all required David to pay alimony to Barbara and to carry life insurance, naming Barbara as the beneficiary, as security for that obligation.

On May 20, 1991, David served Barbara with a motion for reduction in alimony. At the time of the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Herndon v. HerndonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. RufenerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. MeansSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Krage v. KrageSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Cole v. ColeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Sioux Falls v. KelleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Saxvik v. SaxvikSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Vandyke v. Jieun ChoiSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Leedom v. LeedomSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  5. City of Sioux Falls v. KelleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API