Legal Opinion

Rowland v. Rowland

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 9, 1960No. 460PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaekeR, J.

The complaint appears' to be drafted under the provisions of G.S. 50-16 — Alimony without divorce —, although the prayer is only for subsistence and counsel fees pendente lite. However, this stipulation appears in the statement of the case on appeal: “That the said action purports to be in the nature of prayer for divorce from bed and board and for .alimony to plaintiff and support for the children of the marriage between plaintiff and defendant.” There is nothing in the record to indicate such a stipulation was made in the hearing below. Plaintiff in her brief states the action was brought…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mercer v. MercerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Fogartie v. FogartieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Bond v. BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Lyda v. Town of MarionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Cunningham v. CunninghamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chisholm v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. Teague v. TeagueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Blackmon v. GoliaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  4. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Newsome v. NewsomeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API