Legal Opinion
Lederman v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 5, 2001No. CIV.A. 99-3359(RWR)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROBERTS, District Judge.
Plaintiff, an artist and president of an organization called Artists’ Response to Illegal State Tactics (“A.R.T.I.S.T.”), challenges the validity of an amended Capitol Grounds Regulation that created a no-demonstration zone within the 250-foot perimeter of the United States Capitol building. He also seeks to recover damages for his 1997 arrest pursuant to the original regulation. In an Opinion issued on March 14, 2000, I held the original regulation to be unconstitutional on its face and permanently enjoined its enforcement. See Lederman v. United…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lederman, Robert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Seretse-Khama v. AshcroftDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- March for Life v. BurwellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Jefferson v. HarrisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Fenwick v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.