Legal Opinion

March for Life v. Burwell

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 31, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2014-1149PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

[Dkts. ## 11, 16]

RICHARD J. LEON, United States District Judge

Plaintiffs, the March for Life Education and Defense Fund ■ (“March for Life”), Jeanne F. Monahan, and Bethany A. Goodman (together, “employee; plaintiffs”), bring this action seeking injunctive relief from what is commonly referred to as the “Contraceptive Mandate” embodied in the regulations implementing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Defendants are three federal agencies and their respective Secretaries: the United States Department of Health and. Human Services (“HHS”) and Secretary of HHS…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Real Alternatives, Inc. v. Secretary Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  2. Am. Hosp. Ass'n v. AzarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  3. Trump v. OversightCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  4. Commonwealth v. U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  5. Wieland v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2016

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API