J.M. v. State

OPINION

LAURA CARTER HIGLEY, Justice.

In these two accelerated appeals, appellant, J.M., raises three issues challenging the trial court’s separate orders (1) that J.M. be involuntarily committed for temporary inpatient mental health services1 and (2) that she be administered psychoactive medications.2 J.M. contends that the evidence presented by the State at her commitment hearing is legally and factually insufficient to support the findings on which the order for temporary inpatient treatment is based. Concomitantly, J.M. also contends that the trial court’s order to administer psychoactive…