Legal Opinion

State v. Addington

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1979No. B-6597PublishedCited by 504 opinions

1Per curiam

This case involves the determination of the proper standard of proof to be employed to indefinitely commit an individual under the Texas Mental Health Code, Tex.Rev. Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 5547-1, et seq. We hold that the State must prove its case by clear and convincing evidence. The judgment of the court of civil appeals is reversed and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

The State of Texas filed a petition in the probate court to have Frank O’Neal Add-ington indefinitely committed to a mental hospital. The probate court submitted the case on special issues, and the jury found by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Fred C. Walker Agency, Inc. v. LucasSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
  3. Hobson v. EatonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  4. Brown v. WarnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  5. In Re Estate of SoederOhio Court of Appeals · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by504 opinions

  1. In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. In the Interest of G. M.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  5. In the Interest of J.T.G., H.N.M., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003

499 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API