State for the Best Interest & Protection of E.R.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
*299OPINION
Opinion by
Chief Justice MORRISS.
No doubt, E.R. is a woman who suffers from mental illness1 and has not been particularly cooperative with efforts intended to help her. But what comes before this Court is E.R.’s appeal of the trial court’s order committing her for temporary mental health services and directing that she be given psychoactive medications. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 574.034 (Vernon 2003). To justify such an order, the State must meet a rather rigorous set of proof requirements. Because we find that the evidence is legally insufficient to show a recent overt act…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. AddingtonTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- T.G. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Broussard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- John Jones v. City of FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Allen Ray Shipp v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
- State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2011
- State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015
- State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.