Legal Opinion

People v. Izlar

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 8, 1908No. Crim. No. 94PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Kern County, refusing to set aside an information, and from a judgment, and order denying a new trial. Paul W. Bennett, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTaggart, J.

Appeals from an order denying a motion Appeals to set aside an information, a judgment of conviction of the crime of assault with a deadly weapon, and an order denying a motion for a new trial. The first order is not appeal-able (Pen. Code, secs. 1237, 1238), but the objection to it may be considered under the appeal from the judgment.

Defendant was informed against for the crime of “assault with a deadly weapon with intent to commit murder.” Upon arraignment he moved to set aside the information upon the ground that he had not been legally committed by a magistrate. (Sec. 995.) In support of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. DurrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. GoldensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. People v. EppingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. People v. CreeksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. People v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. People v. EganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. People v. MercadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. People v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Morris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API