Legal Opinion

People v. Egan

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 10, 1946No. Crim. 2392PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

On June 6, 1932, Frank Egan, who was then public defender of the city and county of San Francisco, was indicted jointly with Albert Tinnin and Verne Doran for the murder on April 29, 1932, of Mrs. Jessie Scott Hughes. Upon their demand for separate trials a severance was granted as to Doran but denied as to the other two defendants. At the time of arraignment and before entry of plea defendants Egan and Tinnin moved to set aside the indictment but the motion was denied. Doran confessed to the murder, turned state’s evidence, and subsequent to the conviction of Egan and Tinnin pleaded guilty…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. People v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. People v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Sutphin v. SpeikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. People v. ShortsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. People v. TuthillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. People v. DewsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. People v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Frank Egan v. Harley O. Teets, Warden, San Quentin, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API