Legal Opinion

People v. Mercado

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 7, 1922No. Civ. No. 890PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

The appellant, Joe Mercado, and his codefendants, Gillermo Juardo arid Ed Fifer, were charged, in an information filed by the district attorney of San Diego County, with the crime of burglary (charged in the first count), and likewise with the crime of receiving stolen goods (charged in the second count). The record does not show whether Juardo ever was tried. Fifer and appellant were tried jointly. At the conclusion of the trial of these two, the charges against Fifer were dismissed upon motion of the district attorney, on the ground that, as to him, the evidence was insufficient. The jury…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. DurrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. McFarlaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. People v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. People v. TilleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Cobb v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. BoydenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. People v. FlohrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. People v. BratisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. People v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. People v. JuehlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API