Legal Opinion

Valerio v. Andrew Youngquist Construction

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 3, 2002No. A094096PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CORRIGAN, J.

Appellant challenges a judgment based on a finding that there was no contract between the parties and allowing quantum meruit recovery. Appellant claims the court erred in ignoring respondent’s judicial admissions that a contract existed. We reverse.

Factual and Procedural Background

Appellant, a general contractor, did business as Birtcher Construction Services (Birtcher). Birtcher solicited bids from subcontractors to build the Brenden Theater complex in Vacaville. Respondent Bart Valerio was awarded the painting subcontract, knowing that he would be required to submit a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lifton v. HarshmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Welch v. AlcottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Pao Ch'en Lee v. GREGORICUCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Fredericks v. Kontos Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Braverman v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Thurman v. Bayshore Transit Management, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Lackner v. NorthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Myers v. Trendwest Resorts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Bucur v. AhmadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Faigin v. Signature Group Holdings, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API