Legal Opinion

Hallock v. State

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 27, 1984PublishedCited by 871 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Kaye, J.

A stipulation of settlement made by counsel in open court may bind his clients even where it exceeds his actual authority.

Plaintiffs, Carlton Hallock and Seeley Phillips, in 1968 purchased a 67.7-acre tract of land in Schoharie County, about two miles from the proposed site of a dam to be built by the Power Authority of the State of New York (PASNY). Plaintiffs intended to sell sand and gravel from their land to PASNY for use in construction of the dam, but the State, on behalf of PASNY, in 1969 appropriated the entire tract in fee. Plaintiffs filed a claim for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Teitelbaum Holdings, Ltd. v. GoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Greene v. HellmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Ford v. Unity HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Rothschild v. . Title Guarantee Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. In Re Estate of FrutigerNew York Court of Appeals · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by871 opinions

  1. McCoy v. FeinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. N. X. v. Cabrini Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Cromer Finance Ltd. v. BergerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  4. Louis Fennell v. Tlb Kent Company and Joseph PietrykaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  5. Denburg v. Flattau & KlimplNew York Court of Appeals · 1993

866 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API