Legal Opinion
Cromer Finance Ltd. v. Berger
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 17, 2001No. 00 CIV. 2284(DLC), 00 CIV. 2498 (DLVC)PublishedCited by 140 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
COTE, District Judge.
These actions arise from alleged violations of the federal securities laws as well as related state law claims. Plaintiffs Cromer Finance Ltd. (“Cromer”) and Pri-val N.V. (“Prival”) (collectively, the “Cromer Plaintiffs”) filed a class action complaint on March 24, 2000. Plaintiffs in the Argos action (collectively, the “Argos Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint on April 3, 2000. The cases were accepted by this Court as related to SEC v. Berger, 00 Civ. 333.
The plaintiffs were investors in an offshore investment fund managed from New York by Michael Berger…
2Cases cited93 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by140 opinions
- SPV Osus Ltd. v. UBS AGCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Neilson v. Union Bank of California, N.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- In Re Initial Public Offering Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Bear, Stearns Securities Corp. v. Gredd (In Re Manhattan Investment Fund Ltd.)District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.