Ford v. Unity Hospital
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.
The issue on this appeal is whether the unauthorized act of a foreign insurance agent in delivering into this State a cover letter for a policy which was both beyond the scope of and in direct cpntravention of its agency agreement is sufficient under due process standards to subject its principal, a non-domiciliary insurer having no other contacts with New York, to the jurisdiction of our courts pursuant to section 59-a of the Insurance Law. In our opinion, it is not.
The opinions of the courts below establish the following as undisputed facts for purposes of this appeal. Third-party defendant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harriss v. TamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Deyo v. . HudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by191 opinions
- Hallock v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Fischbarg v. DoucetNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Greene v. HellmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Louis Fennell v. Tlb Kent Company and Joseph PietrykaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Frank Paterno v. Laser Spine InstituteNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
186 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.