Legal Opinion

Getman-Macdonell-Summers Drug Co. v. Acosta

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 14, 1933No. 20342PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaylesb, J.

This is an appeal from the district court of Tulsa county. Okla., by Getman-MacDonell-Summers Drug Company, a corporation, hereinafter called defendant, from a judgment in favor of Jesse Acosta, hereinafter called plaintiff, for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff as a result of being struck by a motorcycle driven by Jones, hereinafter called driver, while delivering certain packages for defendant. -

Two assignments of error are presented: (1) That the trial court erred in instructing the jury that the driver was an agent or servant of the defendant instead of instructing the jury that ho…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Hamilton v. Oklahoma Trading Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Barnsdall Refining Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. State Highway Commission v. BrewerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  3. Commonwealth Life Insurance Company v. GaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. Leonhardt Enterprises v. HousemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  5. Briscoe Construction Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API