Legal Opinion

Sulzberger & Sons Co. v. Hoover

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 4, 1915No. 4254PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from County Court, Oklahoma County; John W. Ilayson, Judge. Action -by Samuel Hoover against the Sulzberger & Sons Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

BEETT, C.

This suit was commenced in the justice court for Oklahoma City, by defendant in error, Samuel Hoover, as plaintiff in that court, to recover $195 for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by said Hoover' while in the employ of plaintiff in error, Sulzberger & Sons Company, which was defendant below, alleging that the injuries sustained wera caused by the negligence of the defendant Sulzberger & Sons Company, his employer. The defendant filed no pleadings in the justice court. The cause was tried and judgment rendered for plaintiff for the amount sued for. An appeal was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. RushingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Garvin v. HarrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Hartvig v. N. P. L. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Petroleum Iron Works Co. v. WantlandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Brewer Stannard v. BlackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Prickett v. Sulzberger & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Beasley v. BondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Davis v. BallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Cook v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Marshik v. Farmers Union Co-Operative ExchangeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API