Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Eakin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 12, 1995No. OBAD No. 1166, SCBD No. 4022Published

1Opinion of the Court

914 P.2d 644 (1995)

STATE of Oklahoma ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION, Complainant,

v.

William W. EAKIN, Respondent.

OBAD No. 1166, SCBD No. 4022.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

October 10, 1995.

As Amended on Limited Grant of Rehearing December 12, 1995.

Allen J. Welch, Assistant General Counsel, Oklahoma Bar Association, Oklahoma City, for Complainant.

Gary A. Rife, Perry, Rife, Walters & Sullivan, Oklahoma City, for Respondent.

OPALA, Justice.

In this disciplinary proceeding against a lawyer, the issues to be decided are: (1) Is the record[1] sufficient for a meaningful de novo consideration of the…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Wilson; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Simms.

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Cole v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API