Legal Opinion
State v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided April 21, 1993No. 91-832-C-1 CA A71401PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
849 P.2d 1160 (1993)
119 Or. App. 494
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
Dwayne JOHNSON, Appellant.
91-832-C-1; CA A71401.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
April 21, 1993.
Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Timothy A. Sylwester, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, for motion.
Before RICHARDSON, C.J., and DEITS and DURHAM, JJ.
2Per curiam
The state moves for reconsideration of our opinion, State v. Johnson (A71401), 117 Or.App. 531, 842 P.2d 819 (1992), and contends that we incorrectly stated its concession. We said that the state had conceded that the trial court erred "in imposing an…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
4Cited by3 opinions
- Dwayne Randall JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Carl ZENON, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Johnson v. BabcockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Johnson v. ZenonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997