Legal Opinion
Dwayne Randall JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Carl ZENON, Respondent-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 11, 1996No. 94-36052PublishedCited by 298 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge:
Petitioner, Dwayne Randall Johnson, appeals the district court’s denial on the merits of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, review the district court’s denial of habeas corpus relief de novo, Sanders v. Ratelle, 21 F.3d 1446, 1451 (9th Cir.1994), and hold that Johnson has failed to demonstrate exhaustion of state court remedies.
I
Johnson was charged in Oregon state court with criminal trespass in the first degree and three counts of burglary: burglary with intent to commit menacing; burglary with intent to commit…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Duncan v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Castille v. PeoplesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Anderson v. HarlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sheldon Sanders v. John Ratelle, Warden Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by298 opinions
- Todd Hiivala v. Tana WoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Eric Allen Peterson v. Robert LampertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Armando Castillo v. James McFadden Arizona Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- John Henry Casey v. Robert MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Phillip Jackson Lyons v. Jackie CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
293 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.