State v. Davis
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.
In this felony sentencing guidelines case, the issue is whether OAR, 253-08-007(3), which limits the “incarceration term” that a convicted offender may serve under a “departure” sentence that has been imposed on the offender in the form of a consecutive sentence, applies to the entire indeterminate term of a sentence under the dangerous offender statutes, ORS 161.725 to 161.737. We hold that it does.
To understand the issue in this case, one must have, at the very least, a basic understanding of what the Oregon felony sentencing guidelines are and how they operate. Because this case marks the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. SerhienkoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
3Cited by50 opinions
- State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. GornickOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. DiltsOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. KephartOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. LangdonOregon Supreme Court · 2000
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.