Legal Opinion

State v. Davis

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1993No. CC 90-03-31793; CA A68411; SC S39509PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

In this felony sentencing guidelines case, the issue is whether OAR, 253-08-007(3), which limits the “incarceration term” that a convicted offender may serve under a “departure” sentence that has been imposed on the offender in the form of a consecutive sentence, applies to the entire indeterminate term of a sentence under the dangerous offender statutes, ORS 161.725 to 161.737. We hold that it does.

To understand the issue in this case, one must have, at the very least, a basic understanding of what the Oregon felony sentencing guidelines are and how they operate. Because this case marks the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. SerhienkoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. GornickOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. DiltsOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. KephartOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. LangdonOregon Supreme Court · 2000

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API