Johnson v. Zenon
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.
In this post-conviction proceeding, petitioner alleges ineffective assistance of his trial and appellate counsel. The post-conviction court entered a judgment denying relief and dismissing the petition. Oil appeal, only one of petitioner’s assignments of error requires discussion. Our review is limited to questions of law. ORS 138.650; Hartzog v. Keeney, 304 Or 57, 61, 742 P2d 600 (1987). We affirm.
The following facts are relevant to the issue we address in this opinion. In June 1991, petitioner was convicted of two counts of burglary in the first degree and one count of criminal trespass. He…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Trujillo v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Hartzog v. KeeneyOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. SerhienkoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bogle v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Johnson v. BabcockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010