Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 21, 1993No. 91-832-C-1; CA A71401PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The state moves for reconsideration of our opinion, State v. Johnson (A71401), 117 Or App 531, 842 P2d 819 (1992), and contends that we incorrectly stated its concession. We said that the state had conceded that the trial court erred “in imposing an indeterminate sentence under the dangerous offender statute.” As the state points out, it conceded only that the 15-year minimum determinate term was erroneous, because it exceeded the presumptive sentence prescribed by ORS 161.737(2).

We allow the motion for reconsideration to correct the statement of the state’s concession. However, the case must…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API