Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Babcock

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 10, 2010No. 03C13019; A139796PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

In this action for legal malpractice, plaintiff 1 appeals, assigning error to the allowance of defendant’s motion for summary judgment. As described below, the procedural posture is singular: After plaintiff unsuccessfully sought post-conviction relief based on defendant’s alleged ineffective assistance in criminal matters, see Johnson v. Zenon, 151 Or App 349, 948 P2d 767 (1997), rev den, 326 Or 530 (1998) (Johnson III), plaintiff successfully petitioned in federal court for habeas corpus relief on the same grounds. Johnson v. Zenon, No CV 96-6109-TC (D Or Feb 5, 2001). In allowing…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Drews v. EBI CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Stevens v. BisphamOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Nelson v. Emerald People's Utility DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Woods v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. State v. ManwillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API