Legal Opinion

United States v. Zaida Rodriguez

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 17, 1992No. 91-1252PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ALITO, Circuit Judge:

Zaida Rodriguez appeals from a judgment of sentence following conviction for two drug-related offenses. Rodriguez advances arguments concerning the interpretation and constitutionality of the so-called “schoolyard” provision of the federal drug laws, then 21 U.S.C. § 845a (now recodified at 21 U.S.C. § 860). She also challenges the admission of evidence that she claims was irrelevant and unfairly prejudicial. We will affirm.

I

In June 1990, two Philadelphia police officers assigned to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Task Force, Ronald Abel and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Callanan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Gozlon-Peretz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. United States v. Rufus Brown, Rodney Franklin, Ama Baltimore, Rufus Brown, in 92-3491, Ama Baltimore, in 92-3562Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. William PollenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Arthur TurcksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Michael A. WhrenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  5. State v. McGeeWashington Supreme Court · 1993

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API