United States v. Zaida Rodriguez
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALITO, Circuit Judge:
Zaida Rodriguez appeals from a judgment of sentence following conviction for two drug-related offenses. Rodriguez advances arguments concerning the interpretation and constitutionality of the so-called “schoolyard” provision of the federal drug laws, then 21 U.S.C. § 845a (now recodified at 21 U.S.C. § 860). She also challenges the admission of evidence that she claims was irrelevant and unfairly prejudicial. We will affirm.
I
In June 1990, two Philadelphia police officers assigned to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Task Force, Ronald Abel and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Callanan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Gozlon-Peretz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- United States v. Rufus Brown, Rodney Franklin, Ama Baltimore, Rufus Brown, in 92-3491, Ama Baltimore, in 92-3562Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- United States v. William PollenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Arthur TurcksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Michael A. WhrenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- State v. McGeeWashington Supreme Court · 1993
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.