Legal Opinion

United States v. William Pollen

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 10, 1992No. 91-5703PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT

ROTH, Circuit Judge:

This appeal requires us to determine the allowable units of prosecution for violations of 26 U.S.C. § 7201 (1988), a federal tax evasion statute, as well as several sentencing issues raised by appellant, Dr. William Pollen. Pollen appeals from the sentences imposed by the district court after his plea of guilty to four counts of tax evasion. 1 He argues that these four counts are impermissibly multiplicitous and that as a consequence he has been subjected to multiple punishment for the same violations of section 7201, a result prohibited by the Double…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Sansone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Rewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. United States v. John VoigtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. Richard O. BertoliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Robert Joseph Carr, Jr., in No. 93-1376. United States of America v. Walter Orlando Cardona-Usquiano, in No. 93-1383Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Stephen A. KnoxCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. William F. HelblingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API