Legal Opinion
United States v. Arthur Turcks
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 30, 1994No. 93-1322PublishedCited by 102 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GARTH, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Arthur Turcks was convicted on each count of a nineteen-count indictment, charging conspiracy, credit card fraud and bank fraud. On appeal, Turcks contests the jury instructions, the failure to merge the nine counts of “access device” fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(2), into one offense, and the district court’s restitution order.
We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Because Turcks did not object to any of the district court’s rulings, we review for “plain error”. 1 Although we find no “plain error” in the jury instructions or with…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- United States v. Leonard A. Pelullo, United States of America v. Leonard A. PelulloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- United States v. William Aramony, United States of America v. Stephen J. Paulachak, United States of America v. Thomas J. MerloCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. HastingsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Artemio Vega, Glenn Early, Erwin Rios, and Adolfo MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Ronnie PeppersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.