Legal Opinion

Gozlon-Peretz v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 19, 1991No. 89-7370PublishedCited by 483 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kennedy

This case presents a problem in the interpretation of the federal drug enforcement laws and their reference to the method of postconfinement monitoring known as “supervised release.” Before 1984, drug offenders sentenced to prison were required to serve terms of special parole following their incarceration. The Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 eliminated special parole and, in its place, established conditions for the new system of supervised release. To ensure the orderly implementation of this change, Congress delayed the effective date of the Sentencing Reform Act’s supervised release…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Oscar Mayer & Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by483 opinions

  1. Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Reno v. American Civil Liberties UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Reno v. KoraySupreme Court of the United States · 1995

478 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API