Legal Opinion
United States v. Rufus Brown, Rodney Franklin, Ama Baltimore, Rufus Brown, in 92-3491, Ama Baltimore, in 92-3562
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 9, 1993No. 92-3491, 92-3562PublishedCited by 142 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Circuit Judge.
This appeal from a judgment in a criminal case presents questions of search and seizure law and of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a conviction for drug possession. Co-defendants Rufus Brown and Ama Baltimore were each convicted of three counts of possession with intent to distribute various controlled substances. The convictions rest entirely on evidence obtained in the course of a search of Brown’s home pursuant to a warrant.
Brown’s sole argument on appeal arises from the district court’s denial of the defendants’ motion to suppress the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by142 opinions
- United States v. StarnesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Melinda Holmes v. Steven C. Kucynda, Marty David Rolfe, James C. Bullock, Jason W. Poole, Cobb County, a Political Subdivision of the State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Gene Barrett Johnson, A/K/A Gexex JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Marlon GarthCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
137 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.