Legal Opinion

Callanan v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 20, 1961No. 47PublishedCited by 568 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frankfurter

Petitioner was convicted by a jury in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri on two counts. Count I charged a conspiracy to obstruct commerce by extorting money, and Count II charged the substantive offense of obstructing commerce by extortion, both crimes made punishable by the Hobbs Anti-Rack*588eteering Act, 18 U. S. C. § 1951.1 Petitioner was sentenced to consecutive terms of twelve years on each count, but the sentence on Count II was suspended and replaced with a five-year probation to commence at the expiration of his sentence under Count I.2 On appeal, the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by568 opinions

  1. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  5. Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

563 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API