Legal Opinion

People v. Villalobos

California Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 2012No. S176574PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 6/4/12 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, ) ) Plaintiff and Respondent, ) ) S176574 v. ) ) Ct.App. 5 Crim. F056729 RAMIRO VILLALOBOS, ) ) Tulare County Defendant and Appellant. ) Super. Ct. No. VCF189886A ___________________________________ ) We granted review to address whether imposition of a mandatory restitution fine violates a defendant‟s plea agreement where the parties fail to make the fine an express term of the agreement and where the trial court fails to mention the fine during the plea colloquy. We explained in People v. Crandell (2007)

40 Cal.4th 1301

(Crandell),…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. SeguraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. People v. McClellanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. In Re MoserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. SoriaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Michael Cuero v. Matthew CateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Candace Fox v. Deborah JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. Michael Cuero v. Matthew CateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API