Legal Opinion

People v. Knox

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 10, 2004No. H026701PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McADAMS, J.

Defendant Melvin Lewis Knox was sentenced to prison following a no contest plea. As part of defendant’s sentence, the court ordered him to pay fines, including a restitution fund fine of $1,200. Defendant challenges the court’s imposition of that fine on appeal. He asserts that the fine was not part of his plea bargain, and he asks us to reduce the fine to the statutory minimum.

We reject defendant’s contentions and we affirm the judgment. As we explain, there is no violation of the plea bargain where, as here, the court properly advises the defendant of the restitution fine…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. TimmreckSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. People v. PanizzonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. ManchenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brian A. Buckley v. C.A. Terhune, Director of the CDCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Brian A. Buckley v. C.A. Terhune, Director of the CDCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. Buckley v. TerhuneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. People v. Pena CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API