Legal Opinion

McConaghy v. Sequa Corp.

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided November 5, 2003No. 92-0512LPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

LAGUEUX, Senior District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the motion of the Sequa Defendants for Summary Judgment on remaining Counts III, V, and VI of Plaintiffs Amended Complaint, filed pursuant to Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The “Sequa Defendants” in this litigation are comprised of the Sequa Corporation (Se-qua), its subsidiary, Chromalloy American, Inc. (Chromalloy), and three individuals working with and for Sequa as corporate officers, directors, and controlling shareholders, Norman E. Alexander (Alexander), Robert E. Davis (Davis),…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wilson v. MoreauDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2006
  2. Pardee v. Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2004
  3. Sheehan v. RichardsonDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2004
  4. Ashley v. Paramount Hotel Group, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2006
  5. Hall v. Eklof Marine Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API