Legal Opinion

Heath v. Kirkman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 19, 1954No. 674PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEobbitt, J.

It is plain that the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action for damages for personal injuries proximately caused by the negligence of defendants in operating the wrecker in such manner as to strike and injure plaintiff.

If more than one cause of action is stated, the complaint is subject to demurrer; for there is no attempt to state separately more than one cause of action. In instances where plaintiff may unite in the same complaint two or more causes of action, each cause of action must be separately stated. Gr.S. 1-123. Demurrer is proper when it appears upon the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ledford v. Valley River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Bogen v. . BogenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Bost v. . MetcalfeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Daniel v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Bogen v. BogenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Swenson v. ThibautCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Reid v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Corprew v. Geigy Chemical CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Willis v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  5. Perfecting Service Co. v. Product Development & Sales Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API