Kimberly v. . Howland

The plaintiffs brought two distinct actions for an injury to the feme plaintiff by reason of the negligence of the defendant in conducting certain blasting operations. The husband sued for the loss of his wife's services. The two actions were consolidated and tried together upon the following issues:

1. Was the defendant negligent, as alleged? Ans. Yes.

2. If so, was the plaintiff Janie Kimberly injured thereby? Ans. Yes. (400)

3. What damage, if any, is plaintiff Janie Kimberly entitled to recover? Ans. $3,500.

4. What damage, if any, is plaintiff T. M. Kimberly entitled to recover? Ans. $700.

Fro…