Legal Opinion

Wyatt v. Gilmore

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 4, 1982No. 8114SC706PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

The sole issue raised on this appeal is whether summary judgment was appropriate. This in turn involves the question of defendants’ liability for the mental distress and consequent physical injuries plaintiff suffered as a result of defendants’ negligence. Defendants focus their argument upon a single element of actionable negligence — foreseeability, and we are thus drawn into this most basic, yet amorphous and complex, area of tort law in order to resolve the issue presented.

Our analysis will be two-fold. By way of foundation, it will be necessary to review the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Colla v. MandellaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Lockwood v. McCaskillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Kimberly v. HowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Kimberly v. . HowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Williamson v. LiptzinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Food Lion, Inc. v. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1997
  3. Sorrells v. M.Y.B. Hospitality VenturesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Woodell v. Pinehurst Surgical Clinic, P.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Conti v. Fid. Bank (In re NC & VA Warranty Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API