Shira v. National Business Systems, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
This is the defendants’1 appeal from a decision by the workers’ compensation review division, affirming a decision by the workers’ compensation commissioner granting the plaintiff’s motion to *351preclude defenses.2 The defendants claim that the motion to preclude was improperly granted because (1) there was no employee-employer relationship at the time the plaintiff’s injury occurred, (2) the plaintiffs written notice of claim was technically defective, and (3) there was no prima facie evidence of any injury.
A claimant must first prove an employee-employer relationship before the Connecticut…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Adzima v. UAC/Norden DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Szudora v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Cleveland v. U.S. Printing Ink, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Guinan v. Direct Marketing Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Donahue v. Veridiem, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Vachon v. General Dynamics Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Quinn v. Standard-Knapp, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Rodriguez v. Bruce Manufacturing & Molding Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993