Legal Opinion

Shira v. National Business Systems, Inc.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 30, 1991No. 9589PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.

This is the defendants’1 appeal from a decision by the workers’ compensation review division, affirming a decision by the workers’ compensation commissioner granting the plaintiff’s motion to *351preclude defenses.2 The defendants claim that the motion to preclude was improperly granted because (1) there was no employee-employer relationship at the time the plaintiff’s injury occurred, (2) the plaintiffs written notice of claim was technically defective, and (3) there was no prima facie evidence of any injury.

A claimant must first prove an employee-employer relationship before the Connecticut…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Adzima v. UAC/Norden DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  3. Szudora v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. Cleveland v. U.S. Printing Ink, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. Guinan v. Direct Marketing Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Donahue v. Veridiem, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. Vachon v. General Dynamics Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  3. Quinn v. Standard-Knapp, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  4. Rodriguez v. Bruce Manufacturing & Molding Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API