Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Palace

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1948No. Appeal, 165PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Fine, J.,

Frank Palace, appellant, was convicted of setting up or establishing a gambling house contrary to § 605 of The Penal Code. This appeal challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his conviction and embodies two questions. (1) Did the “Recreation Pool Room” at 138 North Main Street, Butler, Pa., constitute a gambling place? (2) If so, was the appellant connected with the setting up of such gambling place or did he “procure, permit, suffer and allow persons to collect and assemble for the purpose of playing at and staking or betting upon ... (a) game or device of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MarinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Commonwealth v. PreziosoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Commonwealth v. CicconeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Swing v. WalkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  5. Commonwealth v. CarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ParenteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Commonwealth v. DiSilvioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. GiambroneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Commonwealth v. LaniewskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API