Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Carr

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 1939No. Appeals, 223-242PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

These appellants, Eddie Carr, John Murphy, Bernard McNichol, Herbert J. Donohue and James John Friel, were jointly tried together with Willis Irwine and Thomas Maguire, on certain indictments charging them with, what may be described in general terms: as (1) setting np and establishing a gaming house (Nos. 345-351); (2) pool-selling and book-making (Nos. 352-358); (3) conspiracy to set up and maintain gambling devices and games of hazard (No. 360); and (4) conspiracy to engage in pool-selling and book-making (No. 359).

At the same time, William McQuilken and Elmer…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  2. Commonwealth v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Commonwealth v. WilcoxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Commonwealth v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  5. Commonwealth v. ChickerellaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KirkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Commonwealth v. RosenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Commonwealth v. REICHARDSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Commonwealth v. Judge SmartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Commonwealth v. FestaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API