Legal Opinion

Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Kluczinsky

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided September 7, 1976PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacDonald, J.

This appeal from an unfavorable jury verdict and judgment by a defendant who conducted his own trial without counsel raises, primarily, the question whether a pro se litigant who is unable to obtain trial counsel amenable to his demands and terms can claim as error, on appeal, issues not raised by some form of objection before the trial court. It arises from an action brought by the plaintiff, Connecticut Light and Power Company, against the defendant, Joseph J. Klue-zinsky, seeking an injunction and claiming damages for expenses incurred by the plaintiff by reason of the defendant’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  2. State v. SimmsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  3. Currie v. Consolidated Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
  4. Wooster v. Wm. C. A. Fischer Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  5. Bitonti v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. BrigandiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Conservation Commission v. PriceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. Ubysz v. DiPietroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Royce v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  5. Hartford National Bank & Trust Co. v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API