Legal Opinion
Oakland Heights Mobile Park, Inc. v. Simon
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 20, 1994No. 12595PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
The plaintiff in this summary process action seeking possession for nonpayment of rent *433appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendant. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) found that the defendant had sufficiently raised the equitable defense of relief from forfeiture, (2) granted the defendant equitable relief from forfeiture without considering whether the defendant’s nonpayment of rent was willful or grossly negligent, and (3) found that the defendant had cured the rental arrearage that prompted the summary process action.
The…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Cheshire Mortgage Service, Inc. v. MontesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Normand Josef Enterprises, Inc. v. Connecticut National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Lukas v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Nor'easter Group, Inc. v. Colossale Concrete, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Murphy v. BuonatoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Rosato v. RosatoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. v. Property Operating Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- McKeever v. FioreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Oakland Heights Mobile Park, Inc. v. SimonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.