Legal Opinion

Tally v. Parsons

California Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1901No. L.A. No. 984PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, C.

This action was tried before the court, findings filed, and judgment entered for plaintiff. Appellant Gan-, ahl has appealed from the judgment on the judgment-roll. The only question necessary to be determined is as to whether the findings entitled the plaintiff to judgment against appellant. It appears from the findings that plaintiff’s assignor entered into a written contract with defendant Parsons, under the terms of which Parsons agreed to build a dwelling-house for said assignor upon the premises described in the complaint for the sum of two thousand three hundred and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Smith v. . BradyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. United States v. RobesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1835
  3. President of Delaware & Hudson Canal Co. v. Pennsylvania Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Holmes v. RichetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Smith v. BriggsNew York Supreme Court · 1846

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Tally v. GanahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Shriner v. CraftSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. Roberts v. Security Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. County of Glenn v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Patten & Davies Lumber Co. v. McConvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API