Martin v. Bartmus
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDS, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in an action to quiet title to a tract of 320 acres of land in the Imperial Valley. The land was and still is government land, subject to entry and acquisition under the provisions of the act of Congress approved March 3, 1877, and amended March 3, 1891, commonly known as the Desert Land Act [8 Fed. Stats. Ann., 2d ed., pp. 692, etc.; H. S. Comp. Stats. 4674-4678]. By the terms of the act the entryman was not required to live upon the land but was required to make first, second, third, and fourth and final proof…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fish v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Gauthier v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Wilson v. MadisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Orr v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Gage v. GuntherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. McLaughlin Land & Livestock Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Bekins v. TrullCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Crane v. FrenchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Crowder v. LyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Doggett v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.