Polack v. Gurnee
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
As the bill of exceptions in this cause, which consists of six hundred and thirteen pages of printed matter, most of which has no place in a bill of exceptions, contains no specifications calling in question the findings of fact made by the trial court, we must accept as conclusively established the facts set out in the findings. In view of those facts, that neither defendant Gurnee nor defendant Chapman acquired any title to or interest in the premises in controversy by virtue of the patent issued by the United States on June 1,1869, to Daniel Freinere, and mesne conveyances thereunder, was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chapman v. PolackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by15 opinions
- Montana Ore Purchasing Co. v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1902
- People v. HawkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Wood v. RoachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Chapman v. PolackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Buehler v. BassettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.