Legal Opinion
Whittaker v. Pendola
California Supreme Court
Decided February 28, 1889No. 12795PublishedCited by 18 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Calaveras County, and from an order denying a new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
This is an action to recover all but two or three acres of the land described in the following receipt:—
“ Receiver’s duplicate receipt, No. 4760—Homestead.
“Receiver’s Oeeice, Stockton,
February 17, 1887.
“Received of George W. Whittaker the sum of sixteen dollars-cents, being the amount of fee and compensation of register and receiver, for the entry of the east half of northwest quarter, and the east half of southwest quarter of section 18, in township 2 north, of range 14 east, Mount Diablo meridian, under section 2290, Revised Statutes of the United States.
“$16.00. John E. Budd,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Haven v. HawsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by18 opinions
- Livermore v. BealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Sheehan v. VedderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Arnold v. Universal Oil Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Kelsey v. Lake Childs Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Wood v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.