In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Cohen
Oregon Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRiggs, J.
I concur with the majority’s result and analysis, except to the extent that the majority fails to apply prospectively what can be considered only a newly announced rule concerning past letters of admonition as a factor that aggravates a current sanction.
The majority asserts that this court, in the past, generally has considered letters of admonition to be part of a lawyer’s prior disciplinary record. 330 Or at 497. In support of that position, the majority cites In re Stauffer, 327 Or 44, 956 P2d 967 (1998), and a series of cases set out in footnote 6 of *511the majority’s opinion. 330 Or at 498…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of DeversOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of StaufferOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re GastineauOregon Supreme Court · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.